Thursday, April 5, 2007

Giuliani’s deal on abortion

Giuliani, leading the current GOP field, supports both publicly funded abortion and Roe v. Wade.  His so-called deal with social conservatives was to give them judges that are strict constructionists.  Giuliani said this week however that he believes strict constructionists can go either way on Roe v. Wade and wants judges who will respect that precedent.  In addition to his support for embryonic stem cell research, which involves creating human life for the sole purpose of destroying it for research, support of abortion as a human right through the U.N. and opposition to most all Pro-Life efforts, I am completely befuddled as to how this man remains atop the polls for the Pro-Life party of the GOP.  If he captures the nomination, I urge all who care about the abortion issue to vote against him, even if it means voting for Hilary or Obama, because at least that way we’ll get a Pro-Life candidate by 2012, whereas if he wins, we won’t see another Pro-Life candidate until at least 2016.  See http://www.lifenews.com/nat3019.html for details on his statements and backtracking on judges.  http://www.lifenews.com/nat3021.html
Posted by at 15:30:42

Giuliani’s deal on abortion

Giuliani, leading the current GOP field, supports both publicly funded abortion and Roe v. Wade.  His so-called deal with social conservatives was to give them judges that are strict constructionists.  Giuliani said this week however that he believes strict constructionists can go either way on Roe v. Wade and wants judges who will respect that precedent.  In addition to his support for embryonic stem cell research, which involves creating human life for the sole purpose of destroying it for research, support of abortion as a human right through the U.N. and opposition to most all Pro-Life efforts, I am completely befuddled as to how this man remains atop the polls for the Pro-Life party of the GOP.  If he captures the nomination, I urge all who care about the abortion issue to vote against him, even if it means voting for Hilary or Obama, because at least that way we’ll get a Pro-Life candidate by 2012, whereas if he wins, we won’t see another Pro-Life candidate until at least 2016.  See http://www.lifenews.com/nat3019.html for details on his statements and backtracking on judges.  http://www.lifenews.com/nat3021.html
Posted by at 15:30:41
Comments

Leave a Reply